<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update: Google is removing the supplemental query</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/update-google-is-removing-the-supplemental-query/821/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/update-google-is-removing-the-supplemental-query/821/</link>
	<description>Because not everyone can throw thousands of dollars at the 'How do we market ourselves online?' question...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike The Internet Guy's Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/update-google-is-removing-the-supplemental-query/821/#comment-13117</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike The Internet Guy's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 05:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/2007/07/09/update-google-is-removing-the-supplemental-query/#comment-13117</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google Rolls Back yet another useful tool -All about quality my a*^...&lt;/strong&gt;

Recently Google rolled out the Search Query performance report which showed other keywords your broad and phrase matched terms were generating impressions for. Well what do you know&#8230;.. people started seeing what crap their ads were showing up on ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google Rolls Back yet another useful tool -All about quality my a*^&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Recently Google rolled out the Search Query performance report which showed other keywords your broad and phrase matched terms were generating impressions for. Well what do you know&#8230;.. people started seeing what crap their ads were showing up on &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Negative Keyword Tool no longer showing traffic excluded percentage &#124; Mike The Internet Guy&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/update-google-is-removing-the-supplemental-query/821/#comment-13094</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Negative Keyword Tool no longer showing traffic excluded percentage &#124; Mike The Internet Guy&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 06:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/2007/07/09/update-google-is-removing-the-supplemental-query/#comment-13094</guid>
		<description>[...] consistently take away tools that increase quality for their users? Another recent example is Google removing the supplemental query. Implementing negative keywords that an advertiser truely should not be showing up for only [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] consistently take away tools that increase quality for their users? Another recent example is Google removing the supplemental query. Implementing negative keywords that an advertiser truely should not be showing up for only [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt McGee</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/update-google-is-removing-the-supplemental-query/821/#comment-13073</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt McGee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 07:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/2007/07/09/update-google-is-removing-the-supplemental-query/#comment-13073</guid>
		<description>I noticed that same thing tonight, Simon, while putting together the post I just wrote on Wikipedia and followed links. There was no clear divider for when the regular results ended and supplementals began -- it was all mixed together across 4 pages of listings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed that same thing tonight, Simon, while putting together the post I just wrote on Wikipedia and followed links. There was no clear divider for when the regular results ended and supplementals began &#8212; it was all mixed together across 4 pages of listings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Google Removing the Supplemental Index Tag? - WebProWorld</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/update-google-is-removing-the-supplemental-query/821/#comment-13067</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Google Removing the Supplemental Index Tag? - WebProWorld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 01:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/2007/07/09/update-google-is-removing-the-supplemental-query/#comment-13067</guid>
		<description>[...]     So what does everyone think about this?  Here are some more source postings on the subject:  Update: Google is removing the supplemental query » Small Business SEM  Is Google Gearing Up To Drop The Supplemental Result Label?    __________________ KBK Marketing &#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]     So what does everyone think about this?  Here are some more source postings on the subject:  Update: Google is removing the supplemental query » Small Business SEM  Is Google Gearing Up To Drop The Supplemental Result Label?    __________________ KBK Marketing | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Headlines of Note for July 10, 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/update-google-is-removing-the-supplemental-query/821/#comment-13051</link>
		<dc:creator>Headlines of Note for July 10, 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 22:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/2007/07/09/update-google-is-removing-the-supplemental-query/#comment-13051</guid>
		<description>[...] Update: Google is removing the supplemental query [Small Business SEM] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update: Google is removing the supplemental query [Small Business SEM] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sheseltine</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/update-google-is-removing-the-supplemental-query/821/#comment-13047</link>
		<dc:creator>sheseltine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/2007/07/09/update-google-is-removing-the-supplemental-query/#comment-13047</guid>
		<description>Matt, I had noticed the supplementals showing up in the middle of the pack on some long tail searches... 

http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/05/supplemental-listings-leave-limbo.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, I had noticed the supplementals showing up in the middle of the pack on some long tail searches&#8230; </p>
<p><a href="http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/05/supplemental-listings-leave-limbo.html" rel="nofollow">http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/05/supplemental-listings-leave-limbo.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
