Comments on: New Comment Policy http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/new-comment-policy/1206/ Because not everyone can throw thousands of dollars at the 'How do we market ourselves online?' question... Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:57:14 +0000 hourly 1 By: Sean Callahan http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/new-comment-policy/1206/#comment-164254 Sean Callahan Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:13:11 +0000 http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/?p=1206#comment-164254 I just saw this. Good thing I used my name...jk...I don't even think I put my website down. Maybe make that policy link a little bigger or bolder for people to see. I just saw this. Good thing I used my name…jk…I don’t even think I put my website down. Maybe make that policy link a little bigger or bolder for people to see.

]]> By: Kacey Baxter http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/new-comment-policy/1206/#comment-114391 Kacey Baxter Sun, 08 Feb 2009 16:59:08 +0000 http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/?p=1206#comment-114391 Sounds good! Thanks for the blog! It is great for small business owners! Sounds good! Thanks for the blog! It is great for small business owners!

]]> By: Virtual Impax http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/new-comment-policy/1206/#comment-41821 Virtual Impax Sun, 06 Jul 2008 21:37:12 +0000 http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/?p=1206#comment-41821 If you're using the same link luv plug in I am, I'm finding it's passing link juice without the pre-requisite 10 comments. Now I'm making that assumption because I'm using the SEO plug in that "highlights" the comments with the no-follow disabled and all the links here are glowing red... just as they do for me. If you’re using the same link luv plug in I am, I’m finding it’s passing link juice without the pre-requisite 10 comments.

Now I’m making that assumption because I’m using the SEO plug in that “highlights” the comments with the no-follow disabled and all the links here are glowing red… just as they do for me.

]]> By: Marcel Feenstra http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/new-comment-policy/1206/#comment-41787 Marcel Feenstra Sun, 06 Jul 2008 08:51:53 +0000 http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/?p=1206#comment-41787 @RKF, "potentially a lot of work": I would hope that the software/plugin takes care of everything... :-) Sounds like a good approach, unless you now get people leaving lots of short and relatively useless comments, just to hit the "required" number --on the other hand, real spammers are unlikely to take the time to read the policy at all, they'll just leave as soon as they see that [some] comments are nofollowed! @RKF, “potentially a lot of work”: I would hope that the software/plugin takes care of everything… :-)

Sounds like a good approach, unless you now get people leaving lots of short and relatively useless comments, just to hit the “required” number –on the other hand, real spammers are unlikely to take the time to read the policy at all, they’ll just leave as soon as they see that [some] comments are nofollowed!

]]> By: RKF http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/new-comment-policy/1206/#comment-41765 RKF Sun, 06 Jul 2008 01:10:08 +0000 http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/?p=1206#comment-41765 That sounds like a great approach - but potentially a lot of work. I hope the plugin works out! Can you tell us which plugin you're using? Maybe we can get a similar one for us MT users :) Ryan That sounds like a great approach – but potentially a lot of work. I hope the plugin works out!

Can you tell us which plugin you’re using? Maybe we can get a similar one for us MT users :)

Ryan

]]> By: Missy http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/new-comment-policy/1206/#comment-41762 Missy Sun, 06 Jul 2008 00:46:07 +0000 http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/?p=1206#comment-41762 Sounds good, Matt. Makes sense and it may be for the best. Sounds good, Matt. Makes sense and it may be for the best.

]]>