<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My SEO Trends for 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/my-seo-trends-for-2009/1587/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/my-seo-trends-for-2009/1587/</link>
	<description>Because not everyone can throw thousands of dollars at the &#039;How do we market ourselves online?&#039; question...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:57:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/my-seo-trends-for-2009/1587/#comment-111359</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/?p=1587#comment-111359</guid>
		<description>Matt - what do you think about the notion of PR as a way to get increased SEO performance?  I&#039;ve heard of more people trying to get articles placed in larger publications, since those links live online and it&#039;s a twofer: publicity + SEO rankings.  I was thinking of doing some PR too (but with a place like Publicity Guaranteed that charges only on placement) since I need PR, but I think it could influence my SEO too.  What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt &#8211; what do you think about the notion of PR as a way to get increased SEO performance?  I&#8217;ve heard of more people trying to get articles placed in larger publications, since those links live online and it&#8217;s a twofer: publicity + SEO rankings.  I was thinking of doing some PR too (but with a place like Publicity Guaranteed that charges only on placement) since I need PR, but I think it could influence my SEO too.  What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Hecking</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/my-seo-trends-for-2009/1587/#comment-110814</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Hecking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/?p=1587#comment-110814</guid>
		<description>Nice list Matt. I&#039;m already starting to see more client inquiries for local search, so this will be big for sure. I can see why many companies would consider in-house SEO from a cost standpoint. Having worked for both in-house and agency side SEO, I have to lean toward agency SEO when it comes to results. In-house SEOs are pulled in too many directions at times. Agency SEOs benefit from having many other skilled peers to share experience. I have a feeling that many directories will begin to lose their value over the next year or so. Since social media is becoming more important in online marketing, firms will need to pair an SEO strategy with Social Media strategy in order to stay competitive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice list Matt. I&#8217;m already starting to see more client inquiries for local search, so this will be big for sure. I can see why many companies would consider in-house SEO from a cost standpoint. Having worked for both in-house and agency side SEO, I have to lean toward agency SEO when it comes to results. In-house SEOs are pulled in too many directions at times. Agency SEOs benefit from having many other skilled peers to share experience. I have a feeling that many directories will begin to lose their value over the next year or so. Since social media is becoming more important in online marketing, firms will need to pair an SEO strategy with Social Media strategy in order to stay competitive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt McGee</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/my-seo-trends-for-2009/1587/#comment-110553</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt McGee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/?p=1587#comment-110553</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments, gang. Ben - can you be more specific?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments, gang. Ben &#8211; can you be more specific?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/my-seo-trends-for-2009/1587/#comment-110552</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/?p=1587#comment-110552</guid>
		<description>Matt,
 
What are you thoughts on the increasing popularity of &quot;directory&quot; sites dominating various categories in the organic search listings?  

Although some are useful, it is starting to remind me of the paid ads of the past - those that simply brought you to another list of (paid) ads. 

Keep up the great work!

Ben</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,</p>
<p>What are you thoughts on the increasing popularity of &#8220;directory&#8221; sites dominating various categories in the organic search listings?  </p>
<p>Although some are useful, it is starting to remind me of the paid ads of the past &#8211; those that simply brought you to another list of (paid) ads. </p>
<p>Keep up the great work!</p>
<p>Ben</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ocha</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/my-seo-trends-for-2009/1587/#comment-110311</link>
		<dc:creator>Ocha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 04:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/?p=1587#comment-110311</guid>
		<description>The thing I have learned about SEO is that it changes. Just as your article on FoxNews indicates Google made 400 changes. Wow! So I still try to write for the humans with a dash of SEO. Sure I structure my posts around a particular topic and build around the key phrase. Just keep it real and be yourself. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing I have learned about SEO is that it changes. Just as your article on FoxNews indicates Google made 400 changes. Wow! So I still try to write for the humans with a dash of SEO. Sure I structure my posts around a particular topic and build around the key phrase. Just keep it real and be yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Campbell</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/my-seo-trends-for-2009/1587/#comment-110251</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/?p=1587#comment-110251</guid>
		<description>I just read it this morning - excellent article Matt. 

I agree - lots more interest in SEO services, video is going to get even bigger, and uncertainty about how personalized search results will be accepted.
-Don</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read it this morning &#8211; excellent article Matt. </p>
<p>I agree &#8211; lots more interest in SEO services, video is going to get even bigger, and uncertainty about how personalized search results will be accepted.<br />
-Don</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
