<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Locksmith Spam on Bing? You Bet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/locksmith-spam-on-bing-you-bet/2016/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/locksmith-spam-on-bing-you-bet/2016/</link>
	<description>Because not everyone can throw thousands of dollars at the &#039;How do we market ourselves online?&#039; question...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:32:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert V</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/locksmith-spam-on-bing-you-bet/2016/#comment-162500</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 22:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/?p=2016#comment-162500</guid>
		<description>As the owner of a small locksmith shop, I was more than disappointed with Bing&#039;s results myself. In addition to the map listings, their natural search results also return many of the bogus locksmith websites (with real companies showing up much further down). I wish the big three would just acknowledge the failure of their &quot;local&quot; maps listings and do away with them. 

For tips on protecting yourself from locksmith fraud, visit the Knowledge Center on our website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the owner of a small locksmith shop, I was more than disappointed with Bing&#8217;s results myself. In addition to the map listings, their natural search results also return many of the bogus locksmith websites (with real companies showing up much further down). I wish the big three would just acknowledge the failure of their &#8220;local&#8221; maps listings and do away with them. </p>
<p>For tips on protecting yourself from locksmith fraud, visit the Knowledge Center on our website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Oremland</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/locksmith-spam-on-bing-you-bet/2016/#comment-151341</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Oremland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 22:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/?p=2016#comment-151341</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure if Mike Blumenthal published this somewhere or I gleaned it from him through conversations/email.

The locksmiths have spammed everything.  They&#039;ve spammed the data providers, the local/maps versions of the search engines, the IYP&#039;s, etc.  Where they could perform spam...they did it.  In fact there is some case that was or is being pursued in Missouri (or Kansas) being pursued by the state&#039;s attorney general specifically related to locksmith spam on IYP&#039;s.

The point is that locksmith spam is everywhere.

I believe one of the engines should take a strong stand on it.  As David Mihm suggested, one of the engines should be public in this regard.  We would support them.

I&#039;m sure many in the community of Local SEO&#039;s and those with clients would publicise this very aggressively to work to let the public know that at least one version of Local or Maps had a modicum of reliable information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if Mike Blumenthal published this somewhere or I gleaned it from him through conversations/email.</p>
<p>The locksmiths have spammed everything.  They&#8217;ve spammed the data providers, the local/maps versions of the search engines, the IYP&#8217;s, etc.  Where they could perform spam&#8230;they did it.  In fact there is some case that was or is being pursued in Missouri (or Kansas) being pursued by the state&#8217;s attorney general specifically related to locksmith spam on IYP&#8217;s.</p>
<p>The point is that locksmith spam is everywhere.</p>
<p>I believe one of the engines should take a strong stand on it.  As David Mihm suggested, one of the engines should be public in this regard.  We would support them.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure many in the community of Local SEO&#8217;s and those with clients would publicise this very aggressively to work to let the public know that at least one version of Local or Maps had a modicum of reliable information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SearchCap: The Day In Search, May 29, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/locksmith-spam-on-bing-you-bet/2016/#comment-151332</link>
		<dc:creator>SearchCap: The Day In Search, May 29, 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/?p=2016#comment-151332</guid>
		<description>[...] Locksmith Spam on Bing? You Bet, Small Business SEM [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Locksmith Spam on Bing? You Bet, Small Business SEM [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebRhynoSEO</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/locksmith-spam-on-bing-you-bet/2016/#comment-151306</link>
		<dc:creator>WebRhynoSEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 18:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/?p=2016#comment-151306</guid>
		<description>Is this what gets passed off as professional SEO these days? The USA is really overrun with so-called professional optimizers who run these gags. I&#039;ve begun turning my attention outside the US and have discovered there is still lots of fertile soil in countries without these clowns/posers. 

Fortunately it&#039;s just Live Search. Last numbers I saw said that their share of search traffic is under 10%, is that number still accurate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this what gets passed off as professional SEO these days? The USA is really overrun with so-called professional optimizers who run these gags. I&#8217;ve begun turning my attention outside the US and have discovered there is still lots of fertile soil in countries without these clowns/posers. </p>
<p>Fortunately it&#8217;s just Live Search. Last numbers I saw said that their share of search traffic is under 10%, is that number still accurate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mapspam Already on Kumo/Bing &#171; Screenwerk</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/locksmith-spam-on-bing-you-bet/2016/#comment-151268</link>
		<dc:creator>Mapspam Already on Kumo/Bing &#171; Screenwerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 14:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/?p=2016#comment-151268</guid>
		<description>[...] on the local side of things beyond what I did yesterday for Search Engine Land. But Matt McGee beat me to it and found . . . mapspam on Kumo/Bing. He said he compared it to Live Search results for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the local side of things beyond what I did yesterday for Search Engine Land. But Matt McGee beat me to it and found . . . mapspam on Kumo/Bing. He said he compared it to Live Search results for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Hucker</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/locksmith-spam-on-bing-you-bet/2016/#comment-151259</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Hucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 13:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/?p=2016#comment-151259</guid>
		<description>looks like Dave just beat me to it. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks like Dave just beat me to it. <img src='http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->