<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Supplemental Results Query: Broken?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/817/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/817/</link>
	<description>Because not everyone can throw thousands of dollars at the &#039;How do we market ourselves online?&#039; question...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:57:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Google&#8217;s Supplemental Spin Is BS &#124; TheVanBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/817/#comment-17686</link>
		<dc:creator>Google&#8217;s Supplemental Spin Is BS &#124; TheVanBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/2007/07/05/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/#comment-17686</guid>
		<description>[...] Google’s Supplemental Results Query: Broken? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google’s Supplemental Results Query: Broken? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Ways to Find Supplemental Results in Google</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/817/#comment-13434</link>
		<dc:creator>New Ways to Find Supplemental Results in Google</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/2007/07/05/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/#comment-13434</guid>
		<description>[...] Small Business SEM noticed that the “show all your Google supplemental results” query was broken and this query no longer showed results from Google’s supplemental index only. However, they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Small Business SEM noticed that the “show all your Google supplemental results” query was broken and this query no longer showed results from Google’s supplemental index only. However, they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google&#8217;s Supplemental Spin Is BS - TheVanBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/817/#comment-13065</link>
		<dc:creator>Google&#8217;s Supplemental Spin Is BS - TheVanBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/2007/07/05/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/#comment-13065</guid>
		<description>[...] Google’s Supplemental Results Query: Broken? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google’s Supplemental Results Query: Broken? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Google Gearing Up To Drop The Supplemental Result Label? - Webmaster Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/817/#comment-13050</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Google Gearing Up To Drop The Supplemental Result Label? - Webmaster Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/2007/07/05/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/#comment-13050</guid>
		<description>[...] Gearing Up To Drop The Supplemental Result Label?  Jul. 10, 2007 by Barry Schwartz   Matt McGee reported last week that he noticed that a method where webmasters can see pages that Google places in its [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gearing Up To Drop The Supplemental Result Label?  Jul. 10, 2007 by Barry Schwartz   Matt McGee reported last week that he noticed that a method where webmasters can see pages that Google places in its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moteurs News</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/817/#comment-13045</link>
		<dc:creator>Moteurs News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 07:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/2007/07/05/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/#comment-13045</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google devrait supprimer la requête permettant de trouver ses pages en résultat complémentaire...&lt;/strong&gt;

Jusqu&#039;à maintenant, pour trouver rapidement les pages d&#039;un site se trouvant dans l&#039;index complémentaire, il y avait un moyen relativement efficace et rapide. Il suffisait de faire la requête suivante :


site:www.example.com *** -ghjkg......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google devrait supprimer la requête permettant de trouver ses pages en résultat complémentaire&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Jusqu&#8217;à maintenant, pour trouver rapidement les pages d&#8217;un site se trouvant dans l&#8217;index complémentaire, il y avait un moyen relativement efficace et rapide. Il suffisait de faire la requête suivante :</p>
<p>site:www.example.com *** -ghjkg&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt McGee</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/817/#comment-13031</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt McGee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 23:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/2007/07/05/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/#comment-13031</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s still broken for me. And I&#039;m also on 64.233.167.99 ... ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s still broken for me. And I&#8217;m also on 64.233.167.99 &#8230; ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
