<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Supplemental Results Query: Broken?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/817/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/817/</link>
	<description>Because not everyone can throw thousands of dollars at the 'How do we market ourselves online?' question...</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Google&#8217;s Supplemental Spin Is BS &#124; TheVanBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/817/#comment-17686</link>
		<dc:creator>Google&#8217;s Supplemental Spin Is BS &#124; TheVanBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/2007/07/05/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/#comment-17686</guid>
		<description>[...] Google’s Supplemental Results Query: Broken? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google’s Supplemental Results Query: Broken? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Ways to Find Supplemental Results in Google</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/817/#comment-13434</link>
		<dc:creator>New Ways to Find Supplemental Results in Google</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/2007/07/05/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/#comment-13434</guid>
		<description>[...] Small Business SEM noticed that the “show all your Google supplemental results” query was broken and this query no longer showed results from Google’s supplemental index only. However, they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Small Business SEM noticed that the “show all your Google supplemental results” query was broken and this query no longer showed results from Google’s supplemental index only. However, they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google&#8217;s Supplemental Spin Is BS - TheVanBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/817/#comment-13065</link>
		<dc:creator>Google&#8217;s Supplemental Spin Is BS - TheVanBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/2007/07/05/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/#comment-13065</guid>
		<description>[...] Google’s Supplemental Results Query: Broken? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google’s Supplemental Results Query: Broken? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Google Gearing Up To Drop The Supplemental Result Label? - Webmaster Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/817/#comment-13050</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Google Gearing Up To Drop The Supplemental Result Label? - Webmaster Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/2007/07/05/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/#comment-13050</guid>
		<description>[...] Gearing Up To Drop The Supplemental Result Label?  Jul. 10, 2007 by Barry Schwartz   Matt McGee reported last week that he noticed that a method where webmasters can see pages that Google places in its [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gearing Up To Drop The Supplemental Result Label?  Jul. 10, 2007 by Barry Schwartz   Matt McGee reported last week that he noticed that a method where webmasters can see pages that Google places in its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moteurs News</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/817/#comment-13045</link>
		<dc:creator>Moteurs News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 07:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/2007/07/05/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/#comment-13045</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google devrait supprimer la requête permettant de trouver ses pages en résultat complémentaire...&lt;/strong&gt;

Jusqu'à maintenant, pour trouver rapidement les pages d'un site se trouvant dans l'index complémentaire, il y avait un moyen relativement efficace et rapide. Il suffisait de faire la requête suivante :


site:www.example.com *** -ghjkg......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google devrait supprimer la requête permettant de trouver ses pages en résultat complémentaire&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Jusqu&#8217;à maintenant, pour trouver rapidement les pages d&#8217;un site se trouvant dans l&#8217;index complémentaire, il y avait un moyen relativement efficace et rapide. Il suffisait de faire la requête suivante :</p>
<p>site:www.example.com *** -ghjkg&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt McGee</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/817/#comment-13031</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt McGee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 23:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/2007/07/05/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/#comment-13031</guid>
		<description>It's still broken for me. And I'm also on 64.233.167.99 ... ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s still broken for me. And I&#8217;m also on 64.233.167.99 &#8230; ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Deactivates Supplemental Index Query</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/817/#comment-13020</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Deactivates Supplemental Index Query</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 13:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/2007/07/05/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/#comment-13020</guid>
		<description>[...] first to report on the command being broken is Matt McGee with Rand Fishkin doing a follow-up post. The most [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] first to report on the command being broken is Matt McGee with Rand Fishkin doing a follow-up post. The most [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan_Lash</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/817/#comment-13014</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan_Lash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 01:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/2007/07/05/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/#comment-13014</guid>
		<description>I noticed the same thing this week (on IP 72.14.253.147) and I have a TINY site compared to my peers:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#38;q=site%3Awww.ryanlash.com+***+-adfsdasdf

Strange, I feel so insecure all of a sudden.

:).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed the same thing this week (on IP 72.14.253.147) and I have a TINY site compared to my peers:<br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=site%3Awww.ryanlash.com+" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=site%3Awww.ryanlash.com+</a>***+-adfsdasdf</p>
<p>Strange, I feel so insecure all of a sudden.</p>
<p>:).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SoloSEO</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/817/#comment-13003</link>
		<dc:creator>SoloSEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 12:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/2007/07/05/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/#comment-13003</guid>
		<description>My data center is:

64.233.167.99

Try pinging google.com to find out which data center you use. On a Windows machine, do Start &#62; Run &#62; type "cmd" &#62; then in the new window prompt type "ping google.com". When you want it to stop press ctrl + c. On a mac open the Terminal program in Applications &#62; Utilities and type "ping google.com".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My data center is:</p>
<p>64.233.167.99</p>
<p>Try pinging google.com to find out which data center you use. On a Windows machine, do Start &gt; Run &gt; type &#8220;cmd&#8221; &gt; then in the new window prompt type &#8220;ping google.com&#8221;. When you want it to stop press ctrl + c. On a mac open the Terminal program in Applications &gt; Utilities and type &#8220;ping google.com&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt McGee</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/817/#comment-12996</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt McGee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 06:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/2007/07/05/googles-supplemental-results-query-broken/#comment-12996</guid>
		<description>Yeah, it seems to be a data center-specific issue, then. I used these two and the query still works on both:

66.102.1.107
72.14.203.107

But I go to google.com and whatever data center I'm hitting there -- not working.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it seems to be a data center-specific issue, then. I used these two and the query still works on both:</p>
<p>66.102.1.107<br />
72.14.203.107</p>
<p>But I go to google.com and whatever data center I&#8217;m hitting there &#8212; not working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
