<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 7 Rules for Writing URLs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/7-rules-for-writing-urls/2043/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/7-rules-for-writing-urls/2043/</link>
	<description>Because not everyone can throw thousands of dollars at the &#039;How do we market ourselves online?&#039; question...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:57:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: B.M.</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/7-rules-for-writing-urls/2043/#comment-406833</link>
		<dc:creator>B.M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 18:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/?p=2043#comment-406833</guid>
		<description>Hi Mikkel,

special characters are always a problem, because it depends on the client. Modern browsers, and crawlers like google have no problem, but the &quot;ä&quot; is interpret like &quot;%C3%A4&quot; in the url-encoding. Other encodings interprete this character different, so here begins the problem, because you are duplicating urls, so creating duplicate content. Having much work with redirecting 301 to your destination url with &quot;ä&quot;. But some clients produce errors, so 404 is a common scenario, if you are looking at your google webmaster account or server stats. Try to use a &quot;a&quot;. The outperformance you are looking for a specific term in german, like &quot;ferienhäuser&quot; in SEO, it is not so much regarding this problem. Why you do not use &quot;ferienhaus&quot;? This singular term is also the root keyword, and many people look for this keyword also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mikkel,</p>
<p>special characters are always a problem, because it depends on the client. Modern browsers, and crawlers like google have no problem, but the &#8220;ä&#8221; is interpret like &#8220;%C3%A4&#8243; in the url-encoding. Other encodings interprete this character different, so here begins the problem, because you are duplicating urls, so creating duplicate content. Having much work with redirecting 301 to your destination url with &#8220;ä&#8221;. But some clients produce errors, so 404 is a common scenario, if you are looking at your google webmaster account or server stats. Try to use a &#8220;a&#8221;. The outperformance you are looking for a specific term in german, like &#8220;ferienhäuser&#8221; in SEO, it is not so much regarding this problem. Why you do not use &#8220;ferienhaus&#8221;? This singular term is also the root keyword, and many people look for this keyword also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikkel Simonsen</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/7-rules-for-writing-urls/2043/#comment-173054</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikkel Simonsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/?p=2043#comment-173054</guid>
		<description>Use of special characters link ä, ü, ø, å etc. in the url.
Was is your take on a url like /ferienhäuser/
or is /ferienh%C4%A4user/ better
or /ferienhaeuser/
should I use ä in the url, I can see Wikipedia use %C4%A4 for the ä</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use of special characters link ä, ü, ø, å etc. in the url.<br />
Was is your take on a url like /ferienhäuser/<br />
or is /ferienh%C4%A4user/ better<br />
or /ferienhaeuser/<br />
should I use ä in the url, I can see Wikipedia use %C4%A4 for the ä</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/7-rules-for-writing-urls/2043/#comment-164560</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/?p=2043#comment-164560</guid>
		<description>Agreed with all rules but have one problem - I can&#039;t find really good CMS with all of this futures! Can You suggest something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed with all rules but have one problem &#8211; I can&#8217;t find really good CMS with all of this futures! Can You suggest something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muiden</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/7-rules-for-writing-urls/2043/#comment-158185</link>
		<dc:creator>Muiden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/?p=2043#comment-158185</guid>
		<description>You really shouldn&#039;t do that, just look at the Google results for the keyword &#039;mortgage&#039;. As you can see, the first 20 results all have the term mortgage in the url (either as part of the domain name or page name). So you are really missing out when you use the page id and not a keyword rich page name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You really shouldn&#8217;t do that, just look at the Google results for the keyword &#8216;mortgage&#8217;. As you can see, the first 20 results all have the term mortgage in the url (either as part of the domain name or page name). So you are really missing out when you use the page id and not a keyword rich page name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/7-rules-for-writing-urls/2043/#comment-157788</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/?p=2043#comment-157788</guid>
		<description>Do you recommend never using page id #&#039;s as a URL?

Such as:

www.domain.com/?page_id=18</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you recommend never using page id #&#8217;s as a URL?</p>
<p>Such as:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.domain.com/?page_id=18" rel="nofollow">http://www.domain.com/?page_id=18</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan</title>
		<link>http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/7-rules-for-writing-urls/2043/#comment-154714</link>
		<dc:creator>Johan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 20:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/?p=2043#comment-154714</guid>
		<description>You say that http://www.domain.com/clothing/ is best, but wouldn&#039;t http://www.domain.com/clothing.html be better or alternatively http://www.domain.com/clothing - without the trailing slash (which seems to be quite popular for seo blogs nowadays)?

This way your content would be one level higher in your site structure and so gain importance in the eyes of the spiders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say that <a href="http://www.domain.com/clothing/" rel="nofollow">http://www.domain.com/clothing/</a> is best, but wouldn&#8217;t <a href="http://www.domain.com/clothing.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.domain.com/clothing.html</a> be better or alternatively <a href="http://www.domain.com/clothing" rel="nofollow">http://www.domain.com/clothing</a> &#8211; without the trailing slash (which seems to be quite popular for seo blogs nowadays)?</p>
<p>This way your content would be one level higher in your site structure and so gain importance in the eyes of the spiders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
